In the case of this circuit-training program, the claims outpace reality. That’s like saying that because there’s research showing low carb diets help with weight loss that a diet with no carbs will guarantee that you will drop fat. That doesn’t make the research bad or inaccurate, if not for one small problem: The studies used to “prove” the concepts don’t mirror the workout that is being lauded as the 7-minute fix for your body. The 7-minute workout is more of the former it looked at the perceived benefits of a 7-minute workout and deduced many benefits based on research that was already completed. Understand that research in the exercise field oftentimes falls within two categories: Studies that use prior research to validate prior concepts or designs that test something new while building on previous research. After all, if it only took 7 minutes to get into great shape, the struggle to lose fat would be less of an issue.īefore you start cranking out the “perfect workout” at home and expecting dramatic results or buy into the inevitable 7-minute session coming soon to a gym near you, here’s what you can really take away from the research, and what you can realistically expect to achieve if you follow this routine. And I’ll go on record that you’d be hard pressed to find anyone that has. And you can have a great workout in less than 10 minutes.īut don’t confuse the part from the whole: it is very difficult (and unlikely) to build a healthy body by working out 7 minutes per day and only performing bodyweight exercises, which is the foundation of the 7-minute workout. In fact, when I travel, I’m constantly settling for 10-15 minute workouts instead of my normal 30- to 60-minute session. There’s no denying that exercise-in any dose-is good for your body.
We’ve been misled by a catchy title that has some benefits but falls short on long-term promises. That’s the issue with the recent release of the 7-minute workout. The problem is we oftentimes trust what we want to believe rather than seek to prove if it’s true.
New scientific discoveries are capable of uncovering new information that alters what we believe and thought was true in fact, it happens all the time. I take issue with setting unrealistic expectations that trick people into believing a “minimum effective dose” can lead to maximum results. Here’s a disclaimer: I don’t have a problem with the 7-minute workout. And yet, doesn’t this feel a little played out? I mean, have we already forgotten about “8-Minute Abs?” It’s been nearly 20 years since it was released, and during that time obesity rates have nearly doubled. The 7-minute workout is real and it works…at least, that’s what the mainstream media would have you believe. Next thing you know, Forbes is writing about the workout and the buzz has spread to Good Morning America.
We’re not talking about a piece of equipment that looks like it was dreamt up by 13-year-old boys, it’s research published in the American College of Sports Medicine Health and Fitness Journal. As you process the reported benefits-more muscle, less fat-everything in your body screams “scam,” but the source isn’t QVC-it is The New York Times and the rage that is the 7-minute workout.
#ALEXA JEAN FITNESS AB CHALLENGE TV#
The idea seems like something you’d see on TV at 3 am, with some cheesy, fit pitchman making too-good-to-be-true claims.
0 kommentar(er)
